Domain Name Handbook
DNS NewsDomain DisputesU.S. PolicyICANNMailing ListsArchivesTable of ContentsReviews & CitesViewpointAcknowledgmentGlossarySpecial FeaturesBooklist

The Naming of Hosts

Network Working Group                                       J. Ashworth
Request for Comments: 2100                        Ashworth & Associates
Category: Informational                                    1 April 1997
                          The Naming of Hosts
Status of this Memo
   This memo provides information for the Internet community.  This memo
   does not specify an Internet standard of any kind.  Distribution of
   this memo is unlimited.
   Except to TS Eliot.
   And, for that matter, to David Addison, who hates iambic pentameter.
   This memo is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an
   acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which
   grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of
   the Internet.
    The Naming of Hosts is a difficult matter,
        It isn't just one of your holiday games;
    You may think at first I'm as mad as a hatter,
        When I tell you a host must have THREE DIFFERENT NAMES.
    First of all, there's the name that the users use daily,
        Such as venus, athena, and cisco, and ames;
    Such as titan or sirius, hobbes or europa--
        All of them sensible everyday names.
    There are fancier names if you think they sound sweeter,
        Some for the web pages, some for the flames;
    Such as mercury, phoenix, orion, and charon--
        But all of them sensible everyday names.
    But I tell you, a host needs a name that's particular,
        A name that's peculiar, and more dignified;
    Else how can it keep its home page perpendicular,
        And spread out its data, send pages world wide?
    Of names of this kind, I can give you a quorum,
        Like lothlorien, pothole, or kobyashi-maru;
    Such as pearly-gates.vatican, or else diplomatic--
        Names that never belong to more than one host.
    But above and beyond there's still one name left over,
        And that is the name that you never will guess;
    The name that no human research can discover--
        But THE NAMESERVER KNOWS, and will us'ually confess.
    When you notice a client in rapt meditation,
        The reason, I tell you, is always the same:
    The code is engaged in a deep consultation
        On the address, the address, the address of its name:
                It's ineffable,
                Deep and inscrutable,
   Thanks to Don Libes, Mark Lottor, and a host of twisted
   individuals^W^Wcreative sysadmins for providing source material for
   this memo, to Andrew Lloyd-Webber, Cameron Mackintosh, and a cast of
   thousands (particularly including Terrance Mann) who drew my
   attention to the possibility, and of course, to Thomas Stearns Eliot,
   for making this all necessary.
   [1]  Libes, D., "Choosing a Name for Your Computer", Communications
        of the ACM, Vol. 32, No. 11, Pg. 1289, November 1989.
   [2]  Lottor, M. et al., "Domain Name Survey, Jan 1997",
   [3]  Wong, M. et. al., "Cool Hostnames",
   [4]  Stearns, TS, _Old Possum's Book of Practical Cats_.
Ashworth                     Informational                      [Page 2]
RFC 2100                  The Naming of Hosts               1 April 1997
Security Considerations
   Security issues are not discussed in this memo.
   Particularly the cardiac security of certain famous poets.
Author's Address
   Jay R. Ashworth
   Ashworth & Associates
   Advanced Technology Consulting
   St. Petersburg FL 33709-4819
   Phone: +1 813 790 7592


RFC - 527

RFC - 2100








Contact | Order | Site | News | Disputes | Policy | ICANN | Lists | Archives
Contents | Reviews | Viewpoint | Acknowledgment | Glossary | Special Features | Booklist
 The Domain Name Handbook: High Stakes and Strategies in Cyberspace
Copyright© 1998, 1999, 2000 Ellen Rony and Peter Rony. All Rights Reserved.